ABSTRACT
Objective To meet the needs of public health emergency management in the new era, to improve the problems exposed in the public health emergency system after the outbreak of COVID-19, and to provide the government with a list of the gaps in the construction of the public health emergency system. Methods Several methods, including literature review, observation (discussion and questionnaire survey), and comparative and descriptive research, were used to conduct comprehensive analysis through the combination of induction and deduction. The evaluation questions were graded and were translated into some recognition indexes (averages). The golden section method was used for the recognition standard of evaluation problems, and U test method was used for statistical test. Results Five aspects of problem evaluation and suggestions were determined, including early warning, emergency plan, emergency management department, linkage between systems and epidemic situation judgment. The recognition indexes were 0.916, 0.905, 0.571, 1.000 and 1.190, respectively, all of which met the recognition standard, and there was no significant difference between them(P=0.357). The corresponding measures and suggestions were as follows: early warning trigger mechanism, modular emergency plan, government public health emergency agencies, collaborative emergency drill system of various industries, and expert epidemic situation judgment mechanism. Conclusion It is determined that the proposed measures to complement the weaknesses of public health emergency system in Suzhou are suitable for the locality and objectivity after the three steps of literature review, management staff discussion and professional questionnaire survey. The present study provides an objective basis for the health administrative department to propose the public health emergency system construction project to the government.